This is to voice your opinion and what you think of the current affairs.

Monday, January 19, 2009

THE ISRAELIS PRACTICE THE SAME TACTICS as the Holocaust practiced on them

GRANDCHILDREN OF HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS FROM WORLD WAR II ARE DOING TO THE PALESTINIANS EXACTLY WHAT WAS ALLGEDLY DONE TO THEM BY NAZI GERMANY…

…PLEASE FORWARD…

BUILDING WALLS & FENCES TO KEEP PEOPLE IN PRISONS

CHECK POINTS NOT TO ALLOW PEOPLE BASIC FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT

ARRESTS & HARASSMENTS

DESTROYING HOMES & LIVELIHOODS

GIFTS (WITH LOVE) FROM THE CHILDREN OF PEACE-LOVING & CIVILIZED COUNTRIES

THE CLASSIC PROPAGANDA MACHINE - YOU WILL FIND THE PICTURE IN BLACK & WHITE IN ALL AMERICAN AND SOME OTHER WESTERN COUNTRIES HISTORY BOOKS, ENCYCLOPAEDIAS, LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS… THAT DEPICTS A YOUNG JEWISH BOY WITH HIS HANDS UP WHILE NAZI TROOPS POINT THEIR GUNS AT HIM AND HIS FAMILY IN ORDER TO EXPEL THEM FROM THEIR HOMES… (IT’S SUPPOSED TO MAKE YOU SYMPATHIZE WITH THE VICTIMS & TO SUPPORT THEIR CAUSE FOR JUSTICE & A HOMELAND)

THE ISRAELIS PRACTICE THE SAME TACTICS

Dillon

Friday, January 16, 2009

The situation is so bad











Omar Al Khattab: "Palestine is still the issue" by John Pilger

Also watch John Pilger's famous documentary called "Palestine is still the issue" by John Pilger http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1259454859593416473&hl=en
Holocaust Denied
The lying silence of those who know
by John Pilger
"When the truth is replaced by silence," the Soviet dissident Yevgeny Yevtushenko said, "the silence is a lie." It may appear the silence is broken on Gaza. The cocoons of murdered children, wrapped in green, together with boxes containing their dismembered parents and the cries of grief and rage of everyone in that death camp by the sea, can be viewed on al-Jazeera and YouTube, even glimpsed on the BBC. But Russia's incorrigible poet was not referring to the ephemeral we call news; he was asking why those who knew the why never spoke it and so denied it. Among the Anglo-American intelligentsia, this is especially striking. It is they who hold the keys to the great storehouses of knowledge: the historiographies and archives that lead us to the why.
They know that the horror now raining on Gaza has little to do with Hamas or, absurdly, "Israel's right to exist." They know the opposite to be true: that Palestine's right to exist was canceled 61 years ago and the expulsion and, if necessary, extinction of the indigenous people was planned and executed by the founders of Israel. They know, for example, that the infamous "Plan D" resulted in the murderous depopulation of 369 Palestinian towns and villages by the Haganah (Jewish army) and that massacre upon massacre of Palestinian civilians in such places as Deir Yassin, al-Dawayima, Eilaboun, Jish, Ramle and Lydda are referred to in official records as "ethnic cleansing." Arriving at a scene of this carnage, David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first prime minister, was asked by a general, Yigal Allon, "What shall we do with the Arabs?" Ben-Gurion, reported the Israeli historian Benny Morris, "made a dismissive, energetic gesture with his hand and said, 'Expel them'. The order to expel an entire population "without attention to age" was signed by Yitzhak Rabin, a future prime minister promoted by the world's most efficient propaganda as a peacemaker. The terrible irony of this was addressed only in passing, such as when the Mapan Party co-leader Meir Ya'ari noted "how easily" Israel's leaders spoke of how it was "possible and permissible to take women, children and old men and to fill the roads with them because such is the imperative of strategy … who remembers who used this means against our people during the [Second World] war … we are appalled."
Every subsequent "war" Israel has waged has had the same objective: the expulsion of the native people and the theft of more and more land. The lie of David and Goliath, of perennial victim, reached its apogee in 1967 when the propaganda became a righteous fury that claimed the Arab states had struck first. Since then, mostly Jewish truth-tellers such as Avi Schlaim, Noam Chomsky, the late Tanya Reinhart, Neve Gordon, Tom Segev, Uri Avnery, Ilan Pappe and Norman Finklestein have dispatched this and other myths and revealed a state shorn of the humane traditions of Judaism, whose unrelenting militarism is the sum of an expansionist, lawless and racist ideology called zionism. "It seems," wrote the Israeli historian Ilan Pappe on 2 January, "that even the most horrendous crimes, such as the genocide in Gaza, are treated as desperate events, unconnected to anything that happened in the past and not associated with any ideology or system … Very much as the apartheid ideology explained the oppressive policies of the South African government, this ideology – in its most consensual and simplistic variety – has allowed all the Israeli governments in the past and the present to dehumanize the Palestinians wherever they are and strive to destroy them. The means altered from period to period, from location to location, as did the narrative covering up these atrocities. But there is a clear pattern [of genocide]."
In Gaza, the enforced starvation and denial of humanitarian aid, the piracy of life-giving resources such as fuel and water, the denial of medicines and treatment, the systematic destruction of infrastructure and the killing and maiming of the civilian population, 50 per cent of whom are children, meet the international standard of the Genocide Convention. "Is it an irresponsible overstatement," asked Richard Falk, the United Nations Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and international law authority at Princeton University, "to associate the treatment of Palestinians with this criminalized Nazi record of collective atrocity? I think not."
In describing a "holocaust-in-the making," Falk was alluding to the Nazis' establishment of Jewish ghettos in Poland. For one month in 1943, the captive Polish Jews led by Mordechaj Anielewiz fought off the German army and the SS, but their resistance was finally crushed and the Nazis exacted their final revenge. Falk is also a Jew. Today's holocaust-in-the-making, which began with Ben-Gurion's Plan D, is in its final stages. The difference today is that it is a joint US-Israeli project. The F-16 jet fighters, the 250-pound "smart" GBU-39 bombs supplied on the eve of the attack on Gaza, having been approved by a Congress dominated by the Democratic Party, plus the annual $2.4 billion in war-making "aid," give Washington de facto control. It beggars belief that President-elect Obama was not informed. Outspoken on Russia's war in Georgia and the terrorism in Mumbai, Obama's silence on Palestine marks his approval, which is to be expected, given his obsequiousness to the Tel Aviv regime and its lobbyists during the presidential campaign and his appointment of Zionists as his secretary of state, chief of staff and principal Middle East advisers. When Aretha Franklin sings "Think," her wonderful 1960s anthem to freedom, at Obama's inauguration on 21 January, I trust someone with the brave heart of Muntadar al-Zaidi, the shoe-thrower, will shout: "Gaza!"
The asymmetry of conquest and terror is clear. Plan D is now "Operation Cast Lead," which is the unfinished "Operation Justified Vengeance." The latter was launched by Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in 2001 when, with Bush's approval, he used F-16s against Palestinian towns and villages for the first time. In the same year, the authoritative Jane's Foreign Report disclosed that the Blair government had given Israel the "green light" to attack the West Bank after it was shown Israel's secret designs for a bloodbath. It was typical of New Labor Party's enduring, cringing complicity in Palestine's agony. However, the 2001 Israeli plan, reported Jane's, needed the "trigger" of a suicide bombing which would cause "numerous deaths and injuries [because] the 'revenge' factor is crucial." This would "motivate Israeli soldiers to demolish the Palestinians." What alarmed Sharon and the author of the plan, General Shaul Mofaz, the Israeli Chief of Staff, was a secret agreement between Yasser Arafat and Hamas to ban suicide attacks. On 23 November, 2001, Israeli agents assassinated the Hamas leader, Mahmud Abu Hunud, and got their "trigger"; the suicide attacks resumed in response to his killing.
Something uncannily similar happened on 5 November last, when Israeli special forces attacked Gaza, killing six people. Once again, they got their propaganda "trigger." A ceasefire initiated and sustained by the Hamas government – which had imprisoned its violators – was shattered by the Israeli attack and homemade rockets were fired into what used to be Palestine before its Arab occupants were "cleansed." The On 23 December, Hamas offered to renew the ceasefire, but Israel's charade was such that its all-out assault on Gaza had been planned six months earlier, according to the Israeli daily Ha'aretz.
Behind this sordid game is the "Dagan Plan," named after General Meir Dagan, who served with Sharon in his bloody invasion of Lebanon in 1982. Now head of Mossad, the Israeli intelligence organization, Dagan is the author of a "solution" that has seen the imprisonment of Palestinians behind a ghetto wall snaking across the West Bank and in Gaza, effectively a concentration camp. The establishment of a quisling government in Ramallah under Mohammed Abbas is Dagan's achievement, together with a hasbara (propaganda) campaign relayed through a mostly supine, if intimidated western media, notably in America, that says Hamas is a terrorist organization devoted to Israel's destruction and to "blame" for the massacres and siege of its own people over two generations, long before its creation. "We have never had it so good," said the Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Gideon Meir in 2006. "The hasbara effort is a well-oiled machine." In fact, Hamas's real threat is its example as the Arab world's only democratically elected government, drawing its popularity from its resistance to the Palestinians' oppressor and tormentor. This was demonstrated when Hamas foiled a CIA coup in 2007, an event ordained in the western media as "Hamas's seizure of power." Likewise, Hamas is never described as a government, let alone democratic. Neither is its proposal of a ten-year truce as a historic recognition of the "reality" of Israel and support for a two-state solution with just one condition: that the Israelis obey international law and end their illegal occupation beyond the 1967 borders. As every annual vote in the UN General Assembly demonstrates, 99 per cent of humanity concurs. On 4 January, the president of the General Assembly, Miguel d'Escoto, described the Israeli attack on Gaza as a "monstrosity."
When the monstrosity is done and the people of Gaza are even more stricken, the Dagan Plan foresees what Sharon called a "1948-style solution" – the destruction of all Palestinian leadership and authority followed by mass expulsions into smaller and smaller "cantonments" and perhaps finally into Jordan. This demolition of institutional and educational life in Gaza is designed to produce, wrote Karma Nabulsi, a Palestinian exile in Britain, "a Hobbesian vision of an anarchic society: truncated, violent, powerless, destroyed, cowed … Look to the Iraq of today: that is what [Sharon] had in store for us, and he has nearly achieved it."
Dr. Dahlia Wasfi is an American writer on Palestine. She has a Jewish mother and an Iraqi Muslim father. "Holocaust denial is anti-Semitic," she wrote on 31 December. "But I'm not talking about World War Two, Mahmoud Ahmedinijad (the president of Iran) or Ashkenazi Jews. What I'm referring to is the holocaust we are all witnessing and responsible for in Gaza today and in Palestine over the past 60 years … Since Arabs are Semites, US-Israeli policy doesn't get more anti-Semitic than this." She quoted Rachel Corrie, the young American who went to Palestine to defend Palestinians and was crushed by an Israeli bulldozer. "I am in the midst of a genocide," wrote Corrie, "which I am also indirectly supporting and for which my government is largely responsible."
Reading the words of both, I am struck by the use of "responsibility." Breaking the lie of silence is not an esoteric abstraction but an urgent responsibility that falls to those with the privilege of a platform. With the BBC cowed, so too is much of journalism, merely allowing vigorous debate within unmovable invisible boundaries, ever fearful of the smear of anti-Semitism. The unreported news, meanwhile, is that the death toll in Gaza is the equivalent of 18,000 dead in Britain. Imagine, if you can.
Then there are the academics, the deans and teachers and researchers. Why are they silent as they watch a university bombed and hear the Association of University Teachers in Gaza plea for help? Are British universities now, as Terry Eagleton believes, no more than "intellectual Tescos, churning out a commodity known as graduates rather than greengroceries"?
Then there are the writers. In the dark year of 1939, the Third Writers' Congress was held at Carnegie Hall in New York and the likes of Thomas Mann and Albert Einstein sent messages and spoke up to ensure the lie of silence was broken. By one account, 3,500 jammed the auditorium and a thousand were turned away. Today, this mighty voice of realism and morality is said to be obsolete; the literary review pages affect an ironic hauteur of irrelevance; false symbolism is all. As for the readers, their moral and political imagination is to be pacified, not primed. The anti-Muslim Martin Amis expressed this well in Visiting Mrs. Nabokov: "The dominance of the self is not a flaw, it is an evolutionary characteristic; it is just how things are."
If that is how things are, we are diminished as a civilized society. For what happens in Gaza is the defining moment of our time, which either grants the impunity of war criminals the immunity of our silence, while we contort our own intellect and morality, or gives us the power to speak out. For the moment I prefer my own memory of Gaza: of the people's courage and resistance and their "luminous humanity," as Karma Nabulsi put it. On my last trip there, I was rewarded with a spectacle of Palestinian flags fluttering in unlikely places. It was dusk and children had done this. No one told them to do it. They made flagpoles out of sticks tied together, and a few of them climbed on to a wall and held the flag between them, some silently, others crying out. They do this every day when they know foreigners are leaving, believing the world will not forget them.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Colm O'Connor to deceive the public

Salams,
Please reply to the disingenuous attempt by Colm O'Connor to deceive the public.
Your letters can and do make a difference. We would also like to thank everyone who took part in the vote against Mad Mel in the UK. You'll be happy to know that thanks to a coordinated effort here and in the UK she did not win. Well done!

MPAC Ireland Branch

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

indiscriminate slaughter

While the Palestinians in Gaza endure another night of bombings and indiscriminate slaughter, another battle is underway in the west. The Zionist propaganda machine is engaged in a high-level offensive to win the hearts and minds of the ordinary man and woman.

To facilitate their misinformation dissemination they have enlisted the help of the internet as well as the usual media outlets. A particular piece of software developed by the Jewish Union of Students states that 'Today's conflicts are won by public opinion. Now is the time to be active and voice Israel's side to the world'. GIYUS is in effect a giant lobbying tool designed to manipulate public opinion – and make no mistake, manipulation is the goal – forget about truth!

In addition to this, the Zionist war machine has also taken over media outlets, today witnessed the ethnic cleanser apologist to Ireland, Zion Evrony featured on Newstalk, and prominent pro-Zionist articles in two major newspapers. To further their manipulation, the Zionists have prohibited all foreign journalists from entering Gaza, the news you receive will be vetted and expunged of any evidence of the war crimes this bellicose state is engaged in.

Despite this clampdown, the truth is getting out and it paints a very different picture. We have learned that the vast majority of the dead are civilians, we have witnessed the scores of dead children, and we have seen the devastation. We have seen through the lies and now the truth must be told.


1. A letter to Zion Evrony.
2. Zionists kill civilians

3. Attempted Holocaust in Gaza
4. Children blown to pieces by Zionist missile
5. A warped justification for murder
6. Rabbis say OK to kill civilians
7. Top five Zionist lies.

Mujahid

Is Israel right to try to destroy Hamas?


HEAD TO HEAD : Yes: Sean Gannon . No: David Morrison.

YES

THE IRELAND-PALESTINE Solidarity Campaign (IPSC) has long appeared to operate according to the principle of "my enemy's enemy is my friend". Throughout the so-called Second Intifada, it generally defended the irredeemably corrupt arch-terrorist Yasser Arafat and championed as his successor Marwan Barghouti, sentenced to five life sentences for his murderous role in that conflict.

Nevertheless, the IPSC's recent embrace of Hamas still has the capacity to shock. For the IPSC it seems its victory in the January 2006 Palestinian general election has miraculously turned Hamas from reviled paramilitaries into respected parliamentarians deserving of international support and assistance, and it has castigated the world's refusal to conduct a business-like relationship with the Gaza regime.

But the fact is that Hamas is an unreconstructed jihadist organisation, the Palestinian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, whose self-declared raison d'etre is the "liberation of the region from the impurity of the Jews". According to its 1988 charter, the entirety of Mandated Palestine (today's Israel, West Bank and Gaza) is an Islamic Waqf [territorial trust] "for all the generations of Muslims until the Day of Resurrection", no part of which can be abandoned or renounced "for renouncing any part of Palestine means renouncing [our] religion".

The existence of Israel is therefore, in the words of Hamas founder Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, "an affront to Islam" and Hamas's campaign against Israelis is "an expression of the Divine Will".

And not just Israelis, but all Jews: Article 22 of the charter is an anti-Semitic screed, blaming the Jews for all the ills of the world, from the French and Bolshevik revolutions to the first and second World Wars, and Article 7 states that Judgment Day will not come to pass until Muslims have killed all the Jews.

According to Yassin, Israel cannot be removed "except with force of weapons" and consequently Article 13 of the charter dismisses "peace initiatives" and "peaceful solutions" as "contrary to [our] beliefs". For Hamas "there is no solution to the Palestinian problem except by jihad", a jihad which has to date claimed over 500 Israeli lives.

The Hamas charter thus makes a nonsense of the claim of the IPSC (and many others) that recent statements by Hamas leaders such as Khaled Meshaal offering a long-term truce with Israel in return for a withdrawal to the 1967 borders are indicative of the increasing moderation and pragmatism of the organisation.

Indeed, one need only look to Gaza to see what such an withdrawal/truce would involve. Hamas has repaid Israel's complete evacuation of the Gaza Strip with a rocket, missile and mortar campaign against Israel's southern communities; 5,600 have been fired since August 2005, 3,000 in the last year alone. Today, half a million Israelis are living within range and only sheer good fortune has prevented mass casualties.

Meanwhile, Hamas used the recent six-month truce with Israel to accelerate the process of turning Gaza into a de facto terrorist statelet, stockpiling massive quantities of locally manufactured rockets and smuggled Iranian-supplied missiles, weaponry and explosives, and building an extensive military infrastructure in Gaza city and along the border with Israel, including over 50kms of tunnels, underground bunkers and other fortifications.

With Iranian assistance, it has also created what amounts to a 15,000-strong standing army highly trained in field warfare and weaponry. And according to PA president Mahmoud Abbas, it has allowed al-Qaeda to establish a presence in the Strip.

Hamas has facilitated the process of Gaza's militarisation by ousting it rivals in Fatah in a June 2007 murderous coup (one Palestinian human rights group estimates that over 700 Fatah members were killed) and through the political repression of Gaza's population by means of arrests, arbitrary detentions, kidnappings, beatings and killings.

Its campaign to Islamisise Gaza society has led to the intimidation of secular Muslims through arson, sackings and other daily harassments, while the Strip's tiny Christian population has been subject to violent attacks.

Furthermore, Hamas has exploited Gaza's civilians as human shields by positioning its military installations in residential areas, what one commentator described as placing its "infantry among infants".

In this, Hamas has effectively subjugated Palestinian interests to its own religious and ideological agenda and Gaza today is paying the price. Little wonder that the PA, while decrying Israel's recent actions, has laid the blame for them squarely at Hamas's door and that Arab governments such as Jordan, the Gulf States and Egypt (which has described Hamas-run Gaza as its "border with Iran") are, though compelled to assuage so-called Arab street anger with harsh anti-Israel rhetoric, privately hoping that Operation Cast Lead deals Hamas a death blow.

The fact is that, like al-Qaeda, no political accommodation is possible with the extremists of Hamas, either with Israel or within Palestinian society. If there is to be any prospect of a Middle East peace, it must therefore be destroyed.

Seán Gannon is chairman of Irish Friends of Israel

NO

IN 1967, Israel took over the West Bank and Gaza by force, contrary to Article 2 of the UN Charter. It has held on to the fruits of this armed aggression to this day.

Israel also annexed East Jerusalem and the Syrian Golan Heights. It has built settlements throughout the occupied territories, contrary to Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention. This states: "The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies". Today, and illegally under international law, around 500,000 Israeli settlers now live in enclosed settlements on Palestinian territory and the number is growing all the time.

There seems to be no limit to Israel's ambition to plant settlers on Arab land.

Israel has resisted all pressure from the international community to reverse this land grab. It has refused to comply with UN Security Council demands to cease building settlements and remove those it has built (resolutions 446, 452 and 465).

It has also refused to comply with Security Council resolutions demanding a reversal of its annexation of East Jerusalem (252, 267, 271, 298, 476 and 478) and of the Golan Heights (497).

Invasion, occupation and plantation of Arab land is the reality that Palestinians have faced for decades and still face on virtually a daily basis, as their country is reduced remorselessly.

The right of resistance to unlawful occupation is an established international principle. It is the circumstance in which Palestinian resistance, including armed resistance, has arisen. How can French resistance to Nazi occupation in the second World War be celebrated while Palestinian resistance to Israeli occupation is condemned as "terrorism"?

A political process must be initiated to bring about a just settlement for Palestinians, a settlement that would eliminate the need for Palestinian resistance of any kind.

That process must be backed up by the international community ensuring that Israel comply with outstanding Security Council resolutions on annexations and settlements, so that Palestinians are assured that Israeli expansion is at an end.

In January 2006, Hamas contested the elections to the Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC) and won a majority of the seats, 74 out of 132.

It had not engaged in armed resistance for nearly a year, having announced a truce and ceased suicide bombings in Israel in February 2005. Hamas spokesmen made it clear that they were seeking a long-term truce with Israel, the price being Israeli withdrawal from the occupied territories. This was an opportunity for a more peaceful phase in the Middle East.

But, instead of taking this opportunity, the Quartet (the US, the EU, Russia and the UN secretary general) refused to accept the verdict of the ballot box and deal with the elected Hamas-led governments, despite universal agreement that the elections were free and fair.

This refusal by the US and the EU to accept the Hamas electoral mandate made it easy for Israel to do likewise and to set about attempting to destroy Hamas as a political and military movement.

Elected members of the PLC from the West Bank, belonging to Hamas, including the Speaker, were detained - nearly all of them are still detained - and a fierce military assault was mounted against Hamas in Gaza, despite it being on ceasefire. In all, nearly 700 Palestinians (and 23 Israelis, including 17 civilians) were killed in 2006, a year which began with Hamas on ceasefire and engaging in electoral politics for the first time. But this attempt to destroy Hamas failed.

There was hope in 2008 that Israel might be prepared to deal with Hamas rather than attempting to destroy it. While in February Israel's deputy defence minister Matan Vilnai was threatening a "shoa" (the Hebrew term for the Nazi Holocaust) against Gaza if rocket fire didn't cease, by June a ceasefire was in place, brokered by Egypt.

Israel agreed to cease military operations in Gaza and its economic strangulation of Gaza in exchange for Hamas and other groups ceasing the firing of rockets into Israel.

The agreement brought about comparative quiet along the border between Israel and Gaza for over four months, even though Israel failed to honour its commitment to lift its economic blockade of Gaza.

On November 4th, Israel broke the ceasefire altogether with the killing of six Palestinians, and on December 27th, the "shoa" threatened by Matan Vilnai last February was finally unleashed, with the overt aim of destroying Hamas.

It has failed to achieve that aim. The most likely outcome, after more than 420 dead and 2,000 injured, is a reinstatement, under international pressure, of the ceasefire, which, unlike the current military action, had been successful in protecting Israeli citizens from rocket fire out of Gaza.

David Morrison is political officer with the Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign

This article appears in the print edition of the Irish Times



MEDIA

  • Zionist ambassador Zion Evrony on Newstalk this morning 0630-0900. Send comments to: breakfast@newstalk.ie
  • Ian O'Doherty of the trash Irish Independent tries his hand at supporting the Zionists, he commends Zionist restraint. Write a letter to the editor and let O'Doherty know what you think. email: independent.letters@independent.ie
  • Sean Gannon, Chairman of Irish Friends of Israel, writes that Hamas has no right to exist.





Emergency Motion

In a show of startling hypocrisy, Cllr Eric Byrne of Labour has voted against a motion to call the Child Killer Apologist Zion Evrony to account for his criminal state's barbaric atrocities in Gaza.

Cllrs Eric Byrne, Bill Tormey (Fine Gael) and Julia Carmichael (Fianna Fail) vehemently opposed the sole condemnation of the Zionist State, pushing for a motion that equally condemned Hamas. Cllrs Daithi Doolan and Killian Forde of Sinn Fein expressed a willingness to amend the motion, but pointed out that to water down the current motion was to incorrectly present the war as being a two-sided conflict, a situation Cllr. Forde maintained was simply at odds with reality.

On a forum yesterday evening L'Chaim, a nom-de-guerre of the Zionist State's many apologists, confidently stated that while Muslims were out in the cold, chanting and waving placards – they were busy lobbying those who matter. On this, we must agree, we have now witnessed the strength of such lobbying at DCC. Time to learn, while we march, they shape the politic!

You can watch the debate here, counter setting 02:22. You can also write to Cllr. Doolan thanking him for his support.


Emergency Motion

"That Dublin City Council condemns in the strongest possible terms the recent Israeli attacks and invasion of Gaza and we urge the Lord Mayor to invite the Israeli Ambassador to meet with Leaders of all political parties as a matter of urgency to discuss the situation."


Post your comments here.


Mujahid

'why' of Israel's bloody onslaught on the besieged people of Gaza

Writing in the New Statesman, John Pilger calls on 40 years of reporting the Middle East to describe the 'why' of Israel's bloody onslaught on the besieged people of Gaza - an attack that has little to do with Hamas or Israel's right to exist.

"When the truth is replaced by silence," the Soviet dissident Yevgeny Yevtushenko said, "the silence is a lie." It may appear the silence is broken on Gaza. The cocoons of murdered children, wrapped in green, together with boxes containing their dismembered parents and the cries of grief and rage of everyone in that death camp by the sea, can be viewed on al-Jazeera and YouTube, even glimpsed on the BBC. But Russia's incorrigible poet was not referring to the ephemeral we call news; he was asking why those who knew the why never spoke it and so denied it. Among the Anglo-American intelligentsia, this is especially striking. It is they who hold the keys to the great storehouses of knowledge: the historiographies and archives that lead us to the why.

They know that the horror now raining on Gaza has little to do with Hamas or, absurdly, "Israel's right to exist". They know the opposite to be true: that Palestine's right to exist was cancelled 61 years ago and the expulsion and, if necessary, extinction of the indigenous people was planned and executed by the founders of Israel. They know, for example, that the infamous "Plan D" resulted in the murderous de-population of 369 Palestinian towns and villages by the Haganah (Jewish army) and that massacre upon massacre of Palestinian civilians in such places as Deir Yassin, al-Dawayima, Eilaboun, Jish, Ramle and Lydda are referred to in official records as "ethnic cleansing". Arriving at a scene of this carnage, David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first prime minister, was asked by a general, Yigal Allon, "What shall we do with the Arabs?" Ben-Gurion, reported the Israeli historian Benny Morris, "made a dismissive, energetic gesture with his hand and said, 'Expel them'. The order to expel an entire population "without attention to age" was signed by Yitzhak Rabin, a future prime minister promoted by the world's most efficient propaganda as a peacemaker. The terrible irony of this was addressed only in passing, such as when the Mapan Party co-leader Meir Ya'ari noted "how easily" Israel's leaders spoke of how it was "possible and permissible to take women, children and old men and to fill the roads with them because such is the imperative of strategy … who remembers who used this means against our people during the [Second World] war... we are appalled."

Every subsequent "war" Israel has waged has had the same objective: the expulsion of the native people and the theft of more and more land. The lie of David and Goliath, of perennial victim, reached its apogee in 1967 when the propaganda became a righteous fury that claimed the Arab states had struck first. Since then, mostly Jewish truth-tellers such as Avi Schlaim, Noam Chomsky, the late Tanya Reinhart, Neve Gordon, Tom Segev, Yuri Avnery, Ilan Pappe and Norman Finklestein have dispatched this and other myths and revealed a state shorn of the humane traditions of Judaism, whose unrelenting militarism is the sum of an expansionist, lawless and racist ideology called zionism. "It seems," wrote the Israeli historian Ilan Pappe on 2 January, "that even the most horrendous crimes, such as the genocide in Gaza, are treated as desperate events, unconnected to anything that happened in the past and not associated with any ideology or system... Very much as the apartheid ideology explained the oppressive policies of the South African government , this ideology – in its most consensual and simplistic variety – has allowed all the Israeli governments in the past and the present to dehumanise the Palestinians wherever they are and strive to destroy them. The means altered from period to period, from location to location, as did the narrative covering up these atrocities. But there is a clear pattern [of genocide]."

In Gaza, the enforced starvation and denial of humanitarian aid, the piracy of life-giving resources such as fuel and water, the denial of medicines and treatment, the systematic destruction of infrastructure and the killing and maiming of the civilian population, 50 per cent of whom are children, meet the international standard of the Genocide Convention. "Is it an irresponsible overstatement," asked Richard Falk, the United Nations Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and international law authority at Princeton University, "to associate the treatment of Palestinians with this criminalized Nazi record of collective atrocity? I think not."

In describing a "holocaust-in-the making", Falk was alluding to the Nazis' establishment of Jewish ghettos in Poland. For one month in 1943, the captive Polish Jews led by Mordechaj Anielewiz fought off the German army and the SS, but their resistance was finally crushed and the Nazis exacted their final revenge. Falk is also a Jew. Today's holocaust-in-the-making, which began with Ben-Gurion's Plan D, is in its final stages. The difference today is that it is a joint US-Israeli project. The F-16 jet fighters, the 250-pound "smart" GBU-39 bombs supplied on the eve of the attack on Gaza, having been approved by a Congress dominated by the Democratic Party, plus the annual $2.4 billion in war-making "aid", give Washington de facto control. It beggars belief that President-elect Obama was not informed. Outspoken on Russia's war in Georgia and the terrorism in Mumbai, Obama's silence on Palestine marks his approval, which is to be expected, given his obsequiousness to the Tel Aviv regime and its lobbyists during the presidential campaign and his appointment of Zionists as his secretary of state, chief of staff and principal Middle East advisers. When Aretha Franklin sings "Think", her wonderful 1960s anthem to freedom, at Obama's inauguration on 21 January, I trust someone with the brave heart of Muntadar al-Zaidi, the shoe-thrower, will shout: "Gaza!"

The asymmetry of conquest and terror is clear. Plan D is now "Operation Cast Lead", which is the unfinished "Operation Justified Vengeance". The latter was launched by Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in 2001 when, with Bush's approval, he used F-16s against Palestinian towns and villages for the first time. In the same year, the authoritative Jane's Foreign Report disclosed that the Blair government had given Israel the "green light" to attack the West Bank after it was shown Israel's secret designs for a bloodbath. It was typical of New Labour Party's enduring, cringing complicity in Palestine's agony. However, the 2001 Israeli plan, reported Jane's, needed the "trigger" of a suicide bombing which would cause "numerous deaths and injuries [because] the 'revenge' factor is crucial". This would "motivate Israeli soldiers to demolish the Palestinians". What alarmed Sharon and the author of the plan, General Shaul Mofaz, the Israeli Chief of Staff, was a secret agreement between Yasser Arafat and Hamas to ban suicide attacks. On 23 November, 2001, Israeli agents assassinated the Hamas leader, Mahmud Abu Hunud, and got their "trigger"; the suicide attacks resumed in response to his killing.

Something uncannily similar happened on 5 November last, when Israeli special forces attacked Gaza, killing six people. Once again, they got their propaganda "trigger". A ceasefire initiated and sustained by the Hamas government – which had imprisoned its violators - was shattered by the Israeli attack and home-made rockets were fired into what used to be Palestine before its Arab occupants were "cleansed". The On 23 December, Hamas offered to renew the ceasefire, but Israel's charade was such that its all-out assault on Gaza had been planned six months earlier, according to the Israeli daily Ha'aretz.

Behind this sordid game is the "Dagan Plan", named after General Meir Dagan, who served with Sharon in his bloody invasion of Lebanon in 1982. Now head of Mossad, the Israeli intelligence organisation, Dagan is the author of a "solution" that has seen the imprisonment of Palestinians behind a ghetto wall snaking across the West Bank and in Gaza, effectively a concentration camp. The establishment of a quisling government in Ramallah under Mohammed Abbas is Dagan's achievement, together with a hasbara (propaganda) campaign relayed through a mostly supine, if intimidated western media, notably in America, that says Hamas is a terrorist organisation devoted to Israel's destruction and to "blame" for the massacres and siege of its own people over two generations, long before its creation. "We have never had it so good," said the Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Gideon Meir in 2006. "The hasbara effort is a well-oiled machine." In fact, Hamas's real threat is its example as the Arab world's only democratically elected government, drawing its popularity from its resistance to the Palestinians' oppressor and tormentor. This was demonstrated when Hamas foiled a CIA coup in 2007, an event ordained in the western media as "Hamas's seizure of power". Likewise, Hamas is never described as a government, let alone democratic. Neither is its proposal of a ten-year truce as a historic recognition of the "reality" of Israel and support for a two-state solution with just one condition: that the Israelis obey international law and end their illegal occupation beyond the 1967 borders. As every annual vote in the UN General Assembly demonstrates, 99 per cent of humanity concurs. On 4 January, the president of the General Assembly, Miguel d'Escoto, described the Israeli attack on Gaza as a "monstrosity".

When the monstrosity is done and the people of Gaza are even more stricken, the Dagan Plan foresees what Sharon called a "1948-style solution" – the destruction of all Palestinian leadership and authority followed by mass expulsions into smaller and smaller "cantonments" and perhaps finally into Jordan. This demolition of institutional and educational life in Gaza is designed to produce, wrote Karma Nabulsi, a Palestinian exile in Britain, "a Hobbesian vision of an anarchic society: truncated, violent, powerless, destroyed, cowed... Look to the Iraq of today: that is what [Sharon] had in store for us, and he has nearly achieved it."

Dr. Dahlia Wasfi is an American writer on Palestine. She has a Jewish mother and an Iraqi Muslim father. "Holocaust denial is anti-Semitic," she wrote on 31 December. "But I'm not talking about World War Two, Mahmoud Ahmedinijad (the president of Iran) or Ashkenazi Jews. What I'm referring to is the holocaust we are all witnessing and responsible for in Gaza today and in Palestine over the past 60 years... Since Arabs are Semites, US-Israeli policy doesn't get more anti-Semitic than this." She quoted Rachel Corrie, the young American who went to Palestine to defend Palestinians and was crushed by an Israeli bulldozer. "I am in the midst of a genocide," wrote Corrie, "which I am also indirectly supporting and for which my government is largely responsible."

Reading the words of both, I am struck by the use of "responsibility". Breaking the lie of silence is not an esoteric abstraction but an urgent responsibility that falls to those with the privilege of a platform. With the BBC cowed, so too is much of journalism, merely allowing vigorous debate within unmovable invisible boundaries, ever fearful of the smear of anti-Semitism. The unreported news, meanwhile, is that the death toll in Gaza is the equivalent of 18,000 dead in Britain. Imagine, if you can.

Then there are the academics, the deans and teachers and researchers. Why are they silent as they watch a university bombed and hear the Association of University Teachers in Gaza plea for help? Are British universities now, as Terry Eagleton believes, no more than "intellectual Tescos, churning out a commodity known as graduates rather than greengroceries"?

Then there are the writers. In the dark year of 1939, the Third Writers' Congress was held at Carnegie Hall in New York and the likes of Thomas Mann and Albert Einstein sent messages and spoke up to ensure the lie of silence was broken. By one account, 3,500 jammed the auditorium and a thousand were turned away. Today, this mighty voice of realism and morality is said to be obsolete; the literary review pages affect an ironic hauteur of irrelevance; false symbolism is all. As for the readers, their moral and political imagination is to be pacified, not primed. The anti-Muslim Martin Amis expressed this well in Visiting Mrs Nabokov: "The dominance of the self is not a flaw, it is an evolutionary characteristic; it is just how things are."

If that is how things are, we are diminished as a civilised society. For what happens in Gaza is the defining moment of our time, which either grants the impunity of war criminals the immunity of our silence, while we contort our own intellect and morality, or gives us the power to speak out. For the moment I prefer my own memory of Gaza: of the people's courage and resistance and their "luminous humanity", as Karma Nabulsi put it. On my last trip there, I was rewarded with a spectacle of Palestinian flags fluttering in unlikely places. It was dusk and children had done this. No one told them to do it. They made flagpoles out of sticks tied together, and a few of them climbed on to a wall and held the flag between them, some silently, others crying out. They do this every day when they know foreigners are leaving, believing the world will not forget them.

Source: John Pilger

unified condemnation of the current Israeli Holocaust

Greetings everyone and Salams to Muslims...

It would be wrong to think that Muslims would get a unified condemnation of the current Israeli Holocaust from Irish Politicians... Even if Ireland were to expel the Israeli Ambassador like Venezuela did... it would make little meaningful difference to the people who are suffering... Despite all my opposition to MPAC and its method for bringing change I am in no way opposed to their efforts to influence local politicians (directly that is)... Dont get me wrong on that... But the real people who CAN make a difference and bring an end to the Israeli Occupation are the following... The comparison speaks for itself...


Population
Military Manpower
Military Manpower
fit for service
Military Expenditure
$bn
Israel 7,112,359
3,353,936 2,836,722 11.8187
Egypt 81,713,520 41,654,185 35,558,995
13.7836
Iran 65,875,224
39,815,026 34,344,352
19.0725
Jordan 6,198,677 3,371,706 2,886,132
2.4467
Syria 19,747,586 10,218,242
10,218,242 5.33183
Saudi 28,146,656 14,928,539 8,461,049 54.6
Turkey 71,892,808 39,645,893 33,444,999 45.2567
Yemen 23,013,376 9,932,593
3,585,947 3.71184
Libya 6,173,579 3,293,184
2,821,855
2.91408
Lebanon 3,971,941
2,229,474
1,883,155
1.25364
Kuwait 2,596,799
1,601,065
1,393,356
7.42
Oman 3,311,640
1,429,296
1,207,291
6.94146
Morocco 34,343,220
18,233,410
15,382,861
6.25
Algeria 33,769,668
19,327,735
16,357,759
7.3359
Tunisia 10,383,577
5,905,068
5,005,257 1.06498
Sudan 40,218,456
18,961,029
11,264,895
2.4294
Muslim - Middle East


431,356,727
230,582,445
182,058,952 179.81263
The brother who compiled this list left out Pakistan which is the sixth largest army of the world and a nuclear armed state... I was shocked to learn that Egypt has more than 200 F16s... It is difficult to imagine the level of deterrence and even damage such a number of Falcons can cause...

So we have a situation when our own people... those who can stand up to defend the lives, land and honour of Muslims watch in silence at a massacre that is not really new but is a problem that is half a century old... Does any Cllr got a meaningful influence to bring real change compared to the people that I am pointing at?

Instead of harassing local politicians who dont even share a common belief with Muslims and have nt seen (or possibly care about) the suffering of Muslims in Gaza or any other part of the Muslim world... and who have no claim of brotherhood towards the Muslim Ummah, I think it would be more empowering if we account the Muslim rulers... approach their embassies in demos and harrass their ambassadors wherever we are... including Ireland...

This is something specially for Muslims to ponder upon... I expect that those who have shamelessly defended the sinful and unjust rulers in the Muslim world in the past might have already realized their mistake by now... God willing...

Take Care everyone and God bless!!!

Yours truly...

Dr Qasim Afridi

Boycott Israel Campaign. مقاطعة المصنعات الاسرائيل

1. Boycott Israel Campaign.
2. Palestine Charity Nasheed Night.

1. Boycott Israel Campaign.

According to Al-Jazeera, 763 people have been killed in Gaza including more than 200 children, since air raids first began on December 27. More than 3,121 people have also been wounded. http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2009/01/2009181482839688.html

For almost 2 years there has been an economic blockade on Gaza solely because the exercised their right of voting their leaders.
But interestingly the United states congress and tax payer sends almost 5 billion dollars to Israel annually. http://www.aqsa.org.uk/Portals/0/Leaflets/LF_15_Facts.pdf

Its ironic that when the west promised "never ever again" to another holocaust that the Bosnian crisis starts in the 90's with the death of thousands of thousands of innocent peope, crimes perpetrated were identical to the Nazi war crimes during world war II. Promises are broken again when Chechnya is attacked by Russia, and whilst this battle has been forgotten, the war on Palestinians continues. We must stand up for the innocent people of Gaza.

One of the ways we can stop this aggression is by the boycott of Israeli products and companies supporting the zionist entity is about ordinary people around the world using their right to choose what they buy in order to help bring about an end to oppression in Palestine. Its a peaceful means of putting international pressure on the racist state of Israel and follows in the footsteps of the successful boycott against South African racist apartheid.

Boycott the following major companies that support the Illegal Zionist state of Israel.

1.Starbucks (interesting how they have a Starbucks in the USA base of Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay ). http://www.inminds.co.uk/boycott-starbucks.html
[Try Butlers and Insomnia instead].
2. Coca-Cola http://www.inminds.co.uk/boycott-coca-cola.html [Switch to Pepsi if you love cola, as Pepsi dont support Israel]
4. Mac Donalds [Why eat there when there is O'Briens, Spar or a local kabab shop availiable] http://www.inminds.co.uk/boycott-mcdonalds.html

For the full list of companies that support Israel are

Note: This part of the email may note be an event but its the action of the ordinary people that can make it work as one. The choice is yours.

2. Palestine Charity Nasheed Night.



NB: If you would like to donate to the innocent people of Gaza then send you funds to AIB with the following:

BANK NAME: AIB Clonskeagh

ACC NAME: Federation of Student Islamic Societies

ACC NO: 18102047

SORT CODE: 93-11-87

please enter statement as 'For Gaza' as we need to know how much to send off

Note: Islamic Relief will be the organization that will receive the funds in full and they will spend fully on food and medical supplies. They are already at ground level in Palestine and you can keep up to date with them by visiting: http://www.islamic-relief.com/Emergencies-And-Appeals/emergency.aspx?emID=47

Fundraising activities will be done in support of the ongoing HUMANITARIAN FUND FOR GAZA.

Details
Date: 25th January 2009 (Sunday)
Time: 11.00am
Venue: Aras Ui Chathail, NUIG

What to look out for?

  • Amazing talents from muslim students all over IRELAND …revealed!
  • Guest Artist: Izzat from Malaysian nasyeed group, 'Mirwana' and Ust Erfino Johari
  • MINI BAZAAR (you can even contact the organizer to open up a sale-booth) Certain percentage of total income will be allocated for GAZA
  • First place winners will get up to 200 euros* worth of cash voucher for air tickets to Nasyeed Extravaganza Sheffield 2009 (15 March 2009)

How to get there??

  • There will be a bus chartered for DUBLINERS who wants to get to the event on the day. We hope to be able to visit some famous tourist attractions in Galway as well! (look up for updates!)
  • Tickets : 3 Euros each. 2 euros from the tickets is for GAZA .

To Participate
Please contact: azribohari@yahoo.com
For tickets and more info please visit: http://nexteire.blogspot.com

DON'T MISS IT!!!

http://forgaza.wordpress.com/

Finally please keep the people in your duwaas.

Please spread this email around via email.

Thank you
--
This is a responsible information based e-mail. If you DO NOT wish to
receive further emails, simply contact eireislamicevents@gmail.com and you will
be removed from the list immediately.

Please NOTE Éire Islamic Events does NOT take responsibility for any of the
events, notices or comments, presented in this e-mail bulletin, other than its own. Those who are interested in taking part in
any event or enquiring about a particular notice, should contact the appropriate organisations or individuals. This e-mail is offered as a community service, and is compiled on a best endeavours basis.
If you wish to put up an announcement please email Éire Islamic Events on eireislamicevents@gmail.com

We reserve the right to edit submissions and not to include requests.
--

Israel Says" doesn't target civilians" its a lie


Mujahid

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

الأذان لا ينقطع عن الكرة الارضية ( 24 ) ساعة



بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم


الأذان لا ينقطع عن الكرة الارضية ( 24 ) ساعة فسبحان الخالقلقد توصل باحث في علوم الرياضيات بدولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة لمعادلة حسابية عبقرية ، تؤكد إعجاز الخالق عز و جل في إعلاء نداء الحق ' صوت الأذان ' طوال 24 ساعة يومياً ، وقال الباحث في دراسته : إن الأذان الذي هو دعاء الإسلام إلى عبادة الصلاة ، لا ينقطع عن الكرة الأرضية كلها أبداً على مدار الساعة , فما إن ينتهي في منطقة حتى ينطلق في الأخرى !!! وشرح الباحث \' عبد الحميد الفاضل \' فكرته بشرحه كيف أن الكرة الأرضية تنقسمإلى 360 خطاً ، تحدد الزمن في كل منطقة منها , يفصل كل خط عن الخط الذي يليه أربع دقائق با لضبط , والأصل في ! الأذان أن ينطلق في موعده المحدد , ويفترض أن يؤديه المؤذن أداء حسنا يستمر أربع دقائق من الزمن . ولتقريب الصورة أكثر فإذا افترضنا أن الأذان انطلق الآن في المنطقة الواقعة عند خط الطول واحد , واستمر أربع دقائق , وانتهت الأربع دقائق فإنه سينطلق في المنطقة الوا

Do you still remember us?!
























Do you still remember us?!

We are still under siege,darkness..... And hunger.....Do you still remember us?!

To get water we have to walk so far..... To fill a bottle or a jar......Do you still remember us?!

We still have No food..... Or medicine to be fed..... Our kids..... are dying every day..... in their beds......And many have just tears toshed.....Do you still remember us?!Death! is everywhere..... that sometimes we have No place, to make Our prayer.....Do you Really still remember us?!We have nothing but pain..... illness.....And daily sadness...... to Share......So do you still remember us?! At least in your prayer?!Gaza children implore you! They are dying due to the blockade!There is 'growinghumanitarian crisis,' happening in Gaza..... There is an EXTREMErestricted access, to food, water, andmedicine!! Signature made by : THE DEMOCRATIC! X-HOLOCAUST VICTIM?!!!PRESENT-HOLOCAUST MAKER!!! EXTRA-HUMAN STATE OF ISRAEL!

الدروس الثمانية




سأل عالم تلميذه: منذ متى صحبتني؟ فقال التلميذ: منذ ثلاثة وثلاثين سنة... فقال العالم: فماذا تعلمت مني في هذه الفترة؟ ! قال التلميذ: ثماني مسائل... قال العالم :إنا لله وإنا إليه راجعون ذهب عمري معك ولم تتعلم الا ثماني مسائل؟ ! قال التلميذ: يا أستاذ لم أتعلم غيرها ولا أحب أن أكذب... فقال الأستاذ: هات ما عندك لأسمع ... ****** ****** ****** ****** ****** ****** قال التلميذ: الأولى : أني نظرت إلى الخلق فرأيت كل واحد يحب محبوبا فإذا ذهب إلى القبر فارقه محبوبه فجعلت الحسنات محبوبي فإذا دخلت القبر دخلت معي . الثانية: أني نظرت إلي قول الله تعالى : ' وأما من خاف مقام ربه ونهى النفس عن الهوى فإن الجنة هي المأوى ' فأجهدت نفسي في دفع الهوى حتى استقرت على طاعة الله . الثالثة : أني نظرت إلى هذا الخلق فرأيت أن كل من معه شيء له قيمة حفظه حتى لا يضيع ثم نظرت إلى قول الله تعالى: ' ما عندكم ينفذ وما عند الله باق ' فكلما وقع في يدي شيء ذو قيمة وجهته لله ليحفظه عنده . الرابعة: أني نظرت إلى الخلق فرأيت كل يتباهى بماله أو حسبه أو نسبه ثم نظرت إلى قول الله تعالى: ' إن أكرمكم عند الله أتقاكم ' فعملت في التقوى حتى أكون عند الله كريما . الخامسة: أني نظرت في الخلق وهم يطعن بعضهم في بعض ويلعن بعضهم بعضا وأصل هذا كله الحسد ثم نظرت إلى قول الله عز وجل: ' نحن قسمنا بينهم معيشتهم في الحياة الدنيا ' فتركت الحسد واجتنبت الناس وعلمت ان القسمة من عند الله فتركت الحسد عني . السادسة : أني نظرت إلى الخلق يعادي بعضهم بعضا ويبغي بعضهم على بعض ويقاتل بعضهم بعضا ونظرت إلى قول الله تعالي: ' إن الشيطان لكم عدو فاتخذوه عدوا ' فتركت عداوة الخلق وتفرغت لعداوة الشيطان وحده . السابعة: أني نظرت إلي الخلق فرأيت كل واحد منهم يكابد نفسه ويذلها في طلب الرزق حتى انه قد يدخل فيما لا يحل له . ونظرت إلى قول الله عز وجل: ' وما من دابة في الأرض إلا على الله رزقها ' فعلمت أني واحد من هذه الدواب فاشتغلت بما لله عليّ وتركت ما لي عنده . الثامنة : أني نظرت إلى الخلق فرأيت كل مخلوق منهم متوكل على مخلوق مثله , هذا على ماله وهذا على ضيعته وهذا على صحته وهذا على مركزه .. ونظرت إلى قول الله تعالى ' ومن يتوكل على الله فهو حسبه ' فتركت التوكل علىالخلق واجتهدت في التوكل على الله. فقال الأستاذ: بارك الله فيك
خذ ستين ثانيه من وقتك فقط وحاول القيام بما يلي انشــــــــــــر ولنرى إن كان الشيطان قادرا على إيقاف هذاالأمر :سبحان الله الحمد للهلا اله إلا الله محمد رسول الله الله اكبر اللهم صل وسلم وبارك على نبينا وحبيبنا محمد وعلى اله وصحبه انشـــــــــــــروبعد ذلك قم بإرسال هذه الرسالة وبعد بضع ساعات تكون جمعت حسنات كثيرة جدا لأنك سبب في قيام الناس بذكر الله عز وجل

تعرف على العقل الذي يدير قناة العربية





عبدالرحمن الراشد يكتب بنكهة أمريكية خالصة. وقد اعتاد النظر لقضايانا من خلال نافذة صغيرة في البيت الأبيض.
هو يتورع عن منح الشهادة للفلسطينيين ، لكنه يبذلها بسخاء لمراسلي العربية.

"في مهنة الإعلام يجب أن يكون الخبرُ محايداً والرأي منحازاً". هذا ما أجاب به الأستاذ عبدالرحمن الراشد عندما سُئل عن سبب إصرار قناة العربية على استخدام عبارة (الهجوم الإسرائيلي) على لبنان عوضاً عن عبارة : (الاعتداء الإسرائيلي).
عبدالرحمن الراشد يقول إن قناة العربية التزمت في ذلك بأصول (المهنية) الإعلامية التي تقتضي اختيار صيغٍ وعبارات محايدة عند نشر الخبر. ويضيف الراشد أن العربية نقلت صور ضحايا الاعتداء الإسرائيلي، فالمشاهدُ إذا رأى تلك الصور فهو ليس بحاجة لأن يقال له : (هذا اعتداء) إلا إذا كان (قاصرًا عقلياً، أو صينياً لا يفهم المنطقة).
كنت سأصدق هذا الكلام لولا أني سمعت القناة في نشراتها الإخبارية تستخدم كثيراً عبارات: (اعتداءات سبتمبر) ، و(اعتداءات مدريد) ، و(اعتداءات لندن). فلعل قناة العربية لا تتذكر المهنية وأصولها إلا عند تناول أخبار مصائبنا نحن. أو ربما كانت القناة حريصةً على تفهيم الصينين والقاصرين عقلياً أن أمريكا وأخواتها تعرضوا لاعتداءات وليس مجرد هجمات.
أيضاً : حين تراق دماء الفلسطينيين على أيدي الصهاينة المجرمين فإن عبدالرحمن الراشد يصرُّ على أن مذيعي قناة العربية يجب ألا يصفوا الفلسطينيين بالشهداء، و إنما هم فقط قتلى وصرعى. والسبب هذه المرة ـ لدى الراشد ـ ليس المهنية ، لكنه الورع والخوف من الله. فالأستاذ الراشد يقول : (أنا كمدير محطة لا أمنح الناس الشهادة؛ لأن ذلك حقٌّ رباني).
كنت سأصدق هذا الكلام ـ أيضاً ـ لولا أني سمعت العربية مراراً تنتهك ذلك الحق الرباني، وتمنح الشهادة لمراسليها في العراق حين تتحدث عن الشهيدة (أطوار بهجت) و الشهيد (علي الخطيب) ، والمصور الشهيد (علي عبدالعزيز)!
هذه التناقضات المكشوفة والتبريرات الباردة نتيجة حتمية للمنهجية الغريبة التي يتعامل بها مدير قناة العربية مع قضايا أمته التي عاش زمناً طويلاً بعيداً عنها بعداً حسياً ومعنوياً. الراشد يملك قلماً نشطاً لا يملُّ ولا يكلُّ من الكتابة ولو بصفة يومية. لكنه يكتب بنكهة أمريكية خالصة، حتى لكأنه ينظر لقضايا أمته من خلال نافذة صغيرة في البيت الأبيض.
حين وقعت هجمات سبتمبر وأعلن بعدها جورج بوش تقسيم البشر إلى فريقين فريقٍ في جنته وآخر في جحيمه ، كان الكثير من الكتاب والساسة ينتقدون الهجمات ويعتبرونها جريمة بشعة ، لكنهم يقولون : إن على أمريكا أن تتريث في ردة فعلها وطالبوها بأن تقدم أدلتها وتستأذن المجتمع الدولي قبل أن ترُد عسكرياً. هنا لم يطق الراشد صبراً، فاستل قلمه من غمده وكتب مقالةً عنوانها (جماعة لكن) اعتبر فيها جميع هؤلاء مؤيدين ومناصرين للهجمات ، لكنهم يخشون الإفصاح عن مواقفهم! (الشرق الأوسط 7/7/1422هـ)
هذا المنطق ربما لم يتحدث به خارج أمريكا سوى عبدالرحمن الراشد. وفي مواقف أخرى كثيرة مشابهة لا يكاد القارئ يجد كبير فرقٍ بين لهجة الراشد وبين لهجة الرئيس بوش أو تصريحات المتحدث باسم الخارجية الأمريكية.

ففي تاريخ (19/7/1422هـ) كتب الراشد مقالةً عنيفة هاجم فيها جميع الكتاب والمثقفين الذين يقولون إن هجمات سبتمبر (ردة فعل على ما تقوم به إسرائيل من تعسف وفظائع). وقال : إن هذا (ربط سخيفٌ تماماً). و (كلامٌ مجنونٌ تشمئز منه النفوس)!
وبعد مقالته تلك بأقل من شهرين ألقى مندوب السعودية بالأمم المتحدة فوزي شبكشي خطاباً مطولاً قال في عرضه : (إن التطرف والعنف والإرهاب هو نتيجة للظلم الفادح ، بسبب غياب الحرية والعدالة). هنا تحركت حمية الراشد واستل قلمه من جديد ، وكتب مقالةً عنوانها: (الإرهاب ليس وليد الظلم) . وذكر أن عبارة المندوب السعودي أثارت (انتباهه واستغرابه)! لأنها تحتاج إلى (إثباتات ميدانية)! (الشرق الأوسط 5/9/1422هـ)
مرةً أخرى لما عزمت أمريكا على مهاجمة أفغانستان سارع الأستاذ ليكتب مقالةً عنوانها (فرصة أفغانستان لترتيب أوضاعها) أعلن فيها أن الأفغان أمامهم فرصة لتخليص بلدهم من لوردات الحرب وجنرالات المخدرات ومشاكل الأفغان العرب لينعموا بالراحة والاستقرار. (الشرق الأوسط 5/7/1422هـ)
فليتَ الراشد يحدثنا الآن عن الراحة والاستقرار الذي حلَّ بربوع أفغانستان بفضل القنابل الأمريكية الذكية.
انتهى الأمريكان من أفغانستان وجاء دور العراق ، وبدأ شياطين البيت الأبيض يتحدثون عن مشروع الغزو الجديد. عند ذلك أعلن ضيف المكاشفات في مقالةٍ له أن هناك شعوراً عاماً في العالم العربي، أنه إذا كان سقوط النظام العراقي يعني نهاية أزمة المنطقة على غرار ما حدث للأفغان، فليكن الأمر كذلك في بغداد. (الشرق الأوسط 7/10/1422هـ)
بعد ذلك بزمن ، وحين كانت الطائرات الأمريكية تصب حممها على مدينة الفلوجة السُّنية كان قلم الراشد يقول : إن السنة العرب الآن تحت القصف بسبب عنادهم وجهلهم، وترك زمام قيادتهم للمتطرفين. وقال : إن معركة الفلوجة رغم ما سببته من أذى كبير, ربما أنقذت أهل السنة من متطرفيهم, الذين كانوا يقودونهم نحو الدمار!. (الشرق الأوسط 20/10/1425هـ).
تماماً كما أن الطائرات والقنابل الأمريكية جلبت الراحة والأمان للأفغان وهي تقع فوق رؤوسهم ، فإنها ـ والعهدة على مدير العربية ـ سوف تنقذ أهل الفلوجة حين تدفنهم تحت أنقاض بيوتهم!
ومرةً أخرى حين ظهرت فضيحة سجن أبي غريب وضجَّ لها العالم أجمع كتب الراشد مقالةً ذكَّرنا فيها بأن مثل هذه الجرائم تقع في السجون العربية كثيراً، وتحدَّث عن خطأ تعميم هذه الحادثة على الجنود الأمريكان. لكن العجيب أن الراشد حين يتحدث عن المقاومة العراقية لا يرى مانعاً من التعميم، فهو لا يرى في تلك المقاومة إلا مجرمين يقطعون رؤوس العمال النيباليين ، ويقتلون سائقي الشاحنات الأردنيين! (الشرق الأوسط 13/3/1425هـ)
وتمضي الأيام ، وتبرز النكهة المميزة لكتابات الراشد حين قامت الحكومة الأمريكية بحملتها على الجمعيات والمنظمات الخيرية الإغاثية ، ففزع مدير العربية ليكتب مقالةً عنوانها (منع العمل الإغاثي الخارجي) ذكَّر فيها بأن الدول العربية كلها دول فقيرة ، وبالتالي فعليها أن توجه تبرعات محسنيها للداخل فقط لا غير! (الشرق الأوسط 5/12/1422هـ).
وتمشياً مع الهوى الأمريكي عند موت ياسر عرفات كتب الراشد مقالةً حثَّ فيها السلطة الفلسطينية الجديدة على مواجهة حركتي حماس والجهاد، وإيقاف أنشطتهما ضد الإسرائيليين بشكل لا تردد فيه. (حرب أهلية). (الشرق الأوسط 17/10/1425هـ).

وقبل ذلك لما اغتال اليهود الشيخ أحمد ياسين ـ رحمه الله ـ لم يجد الراشد ما يكتبه سوى مقالاً عنوانه (دعوا الانتقام) ألحَّ فيه على منظمة حماس كي لا تنساق وراء (المشاعر الغاضبة) ، وذكَّرها بأن (الانتقام عملٌ أعمى) وأن أحمد ياسين كان من (الذين يحملون أرواحهم على أكفهم) ، وأن قتله كان متوقعاً في أي لحظة ، فلا معنى ـ إذاً ـ للانتقام! (الشرق الأوسط 7/2/1425هـ).

هذه بعض مواقف الراشد ذات النكهة الأمريكية المركزة، ولدي من مثلها الكثير والكثير. لكن مع معرفتي القديمة بنزعات الراشد وميوله الغربية الأمريكية، فإني لم أكد أصدق عينيَّ وأنا أقرأ ما ذكره في آخر مكاشفاته ـ صراحةً ودون مواربة ـ حين أعلن أن الأمريكيين والغربيين (فقط) هم القادرون على فهم دين الإسلام فهماً صحيحاً ، لأنهم متى دخلوا في دين الإسلام فسوف يتوصلون إلى (إسلام بروتستانتي مطوَّر يقوم على أركان الإسلام الخمسة ببدلة وكرافتة، متسامح في حقوق المرأة والعلاقات الاجتماعية ومع الديانات الأخرى). هذه عبارة الراشد نقلتها بحرفها, وهي مقولةٌ لا تشير إلى معضلة فكرية فحسب ، بل هي إعلان رسمي بأن عقل الأستاذ وآليات التفكير لديه تكاد تتحوَّل إلى منطق ة منكوبة.
هذا الكلام الأخير معناه أن الفهم العصري الصحيح لدين الإسلام ، والذي سوف يرضى عنه عبدالرحمن الراشد لم يوجد إلى الآن، وأنه لا يمكن أن يوجد حتى يتفرغ الغربيون ليدخلوا في دين الإسلام ثم يفسروه لنا تفسيراً صحيحاً مطوراً وبروتستانتياً متسامحاً!
هذه النظرة الموغلة في التطرف لا تستحق الوقوف معها كثيراً ، لكن الذي يعنيني منها أنها أسقطت دعوى الراشد التي أطلقها في الحلقة الثانية من المكاشفات حين زعم أنه كان يرى في والده النموذج الصحيح لعالم الدين ، وأنه ليس لديه مشكلة مع المتدينين ولا مع الوهابيين القدماء ، وإنما مشكلته فقط مع التيار الصحوي المتأخر. فمن الواضح الآن أن الراشد لديه مشكلة مع مسلمي المشرق كلهم لأنهم ـ في رأيه ـ يفهمون الدين فهماً خاطئاً يفتقر إلى التسامح البروتستانتي العظيم!
عبدالرحمن الراشد سبق أن كتب منتقداً الجنود المسلمين في الجيش الأمريكي الذين يمتنعون عن القتال ضد إخوانهم المسلمين في العراق أو أفغانستان ، ولما سأله الأستاذ عبدالعزيز قاسم عن موقفه هذا، ذكر أنه فقط كان يشرح وجهة نظر (العالم الجليل) يوسف القرضاوي. وكأن الراشد نسي أو تناسي أنه سبق أن وصف ذلك (العالم الجليل) على صفحات الشرق الأوسط بأنه (زعيم فرقة التطرف) ، وأن (له دوراً خطيراً في تخريب فكر المسلمين ودفعهم نحو الإيمان بالحرب والخطف والقتل) وأنه من (الشيوخ الحُمر) الذين يقومون بحركة انفصالية من خلال طرح أنفسهم بدلاء لمجامع الفتوى في العالم الإسلامي. هكذا كان الراشد يصور القرضاوي لقرائه، لكن لما صدرت الزلة وأطلق القرضاوي فتوى أمريكية النكهة والهوى أحسَّ الراشد بطعمها وحلاوتها في حلقه ، فتنبه حينئذٍ إلى أن القرضاوي : (عالم جليل) يستحق أن تفرد مقالة لشرح وجهة نظره.
مما تساءل عنه الأستاذ عبدالعزيز قاسم كثرة انتقادات عبدالرحمن الراشد لدولة قطر ، مع أنها أنها دولة صغيرة ليس لها تلك الأهمية الكبرى التي تستحق كل هذه الضجة . أجاب الراشد بأن انتقاداته سببها حالة التناقض و(الشيزوفرينيا) التي تمارسها قطر حين تنادي بالحريات وتمنع الآخرين من نقدها، وحين تريد أن تكون فلسطينية ثورية وخليجية نفطية في وقتٍ واحدٍ. وقال الراشد إن الإعلام يبدِّد وقته في الحديث عن لبنان وهي أصغر من (قطر)، ويتحدث كثيراً عن (البحرين) مع أن (قطر) أكبر من البحرين (17) مرةً.
لكن الراشد لم يتفطن إلى أن حالة التناقض و(الشيزوفرينيا) القطرية ماهي إلا فرع عن حالة تناقض أوضح لدولة أكبر من قطر بأكثر من (850) مرةً.
الراشد يغضب ويعجب من (الشيزوفرينيا) القطرية ، لكنه يهلل ويصفق لـ (الشيزوفرينيا) الأمريكية. هو يعجب من القطريين الذين يريدون أن يكون ثوريين وخليجيين في وقت واحد. لكنه لا يعجب من الأمريكيين الذين يريدون أن يكونوا حماة للحرية والعدالة وحقوق الإنسان، وفي الوقت نفسه يريدون أن يكونوا أنصاراً لجرائم الصهاينة في فلسطين. وقد رأيت الأستاذ عبدالعزيز قاسم يلحُّ عليه في هذه النقطة ، فلم يظفر منه إلا بإقرار واعتراف بوجود (أخطاء!) في السياسة الأمريكية في المنطقة!
ولعل الراشد لم يشعر بـ (الشيزوفرينيا) الأمريكية بسبب امتلاكه لـ (شيزوفرينيا) مشابهة لها. فقد رأيت التناقض والازدواجية ظاهرين في الكثير من كتاباته وطروحاته.
من ذلك أن وزير الثقافة المصري حين تهجم على الحجاب وأثار لغطاً وجدلاً واسعين في مصر كتب الراشد مقالاً عنوانه : (النقد في المجتمعات الحية) أثنى فيه على الصحيفة التي نقلت تصريحات الوزير ، وانتقد الذين قالوا إن نشر تلك التصريحات ليس في الصالح العام ، واعتبر كلام الوزير نوعاً من النقد الذي هو جزء من الحياة السياسية الطبيعية. (الشرق الأوسط 8/11/1427هـ).
لكن هذا الموقف ينقلب تماماً عندما انتقد الشيخ تاج الدين الهلالي مفتي استراليا المرأة التي لا تلتزم الحجاب ، وقال إن من الطبيعي أن تتعرض تلك المرأة للاغتصاب ، لأنها كاللحم المكشوف أمام القطط.
هنا نسي الراشد (النقد في المجتمعات الحية) ونسي أن النقد جزء من الحياة السياسية الطبعية ، فكتب مقالةً اعتبر فيها مفتي استراليا مثيراً للفتنة ، وتمنى لو أنه احتفظ برأيه لنفسه. وزاد على ذلك فذكر أن ذلك المفتي اتخذ من مثل هذا التصريح سبيلاً للشهرة والإثارة السياسية! (الشرق الأوسط 11/10/1427هـ)
ويتكرر التناقض حين يطالب الراشد بمنع المخيمات الدعوية التي تقيمها وزارة الشؤون الإسلامية خوفاً من أن يستغلها (الإرهابيون) لنشر أفكارهم. ثم يعود الراشد بعد ذلك ليتحدث عن مهرجان الجنادرية ، ويفاخر بأنه قد دُعي إليه اليساريون والشيوعيون وبعض من عرفوا بعدائهم للمملكة ، ثم يقول : (إن الثقة في النفس أعظم حماية للدولة من قوانين المنع)! (الشرق الأوسط 14/11/1422هـ).
وكما نرى فمشكلة قطر موجودة لدى الراشد كما هي لدى السيدة (أمريكا). ولا يمكن أن يسلم من ذلك إلا أصحاب المبادئ الصادقون مع أنفسهم.

من طرائف الراشد التي توقفت عندها قوله : إن أدبيات الإسلاميين اليوم منسوخة من أدبيات الشيوعية العربية القديمة، وأنه لا يجد فرقاً في الأطروحات الشيوعية اليسارية التي كانت معادية للغرب وبين الأطروحات الإسلامية الحديثة جداً!.
هذا الكلام لا أستغربه بقدر ما أستطرفه وأضحك منه ، فالراشد لما اعتاد النظر للمشرق من خلال نافذة البيت الأبيض ، أصبح يرى ملة أعداء أمريكا واحدة. فلا عجب بعد ذلك إذا لم يبصر فرقاً بين موقف ودوافع شيوعي ملحدٍ ، وبين موقف مسلم موحدٍ ما دام الاثنان يعادون السيدة أمريكا.
وأطرف من ذلك قول الراشد : إن الإسلاميين في السبعين سنة الأولى من القرن العشرين كانوا على وفاقٍ مع الغرب في باكستان والخليج والقرن الإفريقي ووسط آسيا وأفغانستان.

لست أدري عن أي وفاقٍ يتحدث الراشد ، فهذه السبعون سنة التي يتحدث عنها مضى أكثرها وشعوب المنطقة كلها ترزح تحت جبروت الاحتلال الغربي وتسعى لنيل استقلالها وحريتها بشتى السبل ، وقد بذَلَت في سبيل ذلك الكثير من الدماء الطاهرة. ولم يسلم من المعاناة سوى صحاري الدولة السعودية ، ومع ذلك فإن نُفرة أهلها من الغربيين أشهر من أن تذكر. وبسبب تلك النفرة واجه الملك عبدالعزيز ـ رحمه الله ـ مشاكل داخلية يعرفها من له أدنى إلمامة بتاريخ المملكة. فعن أي وفاقٍ يتحدث الراشد ؟!
هل يقصد العلاقات الودية الرائعة التي كانت تربط بين عز الدين القسام والإنجليز؟! أو لعله يريد روابط المودة والصفاء بين الإنجليز والأفغان الذين أجلوهم بالقوة عن بلادهم! أو ربما قصد الراشد عمر المختار وحبه الجم للإيطاليين الذين قاتلهم إلى أن شنقوه! أو أنه عنى تلك العلاقات المميزة التي كانت بين مصطفى السباعي وبين سجانيه البريطانيين! أو تلك الوشائج التي كانت بين مليون جزائري وبين جلاديهم من الفرنساويين! أو لعله يومئ إلى تلك العلائق العظيمة والمتينة التي كانت بين الشيخ المجاهد (أبو الكلام آزاد) في الهند وبين المحتلين الإنجليز! أو ربما كان الراشد يشير إلى تحالف الإسلاميين في مصر مع دول العدوان الثلاثي!
ولربما كان الراشد يشير إلى علاقات المحبة والصفاء والمودة الخالصة والزيارات المتبادلة بين (إخوان من طاع الله) وعلماء آل الشيخ ، وبين سفراء حكومة تشرشل وجلالة ملكته!

ختاماً أقول : إن عبدالرحمن الراشد قد يفيد الأمريكان والغربيين في معالجة مشاكلهم معنا ، لكنه لن يفيدنا أبداً في معالجة مشاكلنا معهم مادام ينظر إلينا بأعينهم
بندر الشويقي

McDonald French Fries ورطة ماكدونالدز مع البطاطس المقلية


ورطة ماكدونالدز مع البطاطس المقلية
هذه مقالة تحذيرية من بطاطس ماكدونالدز ,من مقالة فى جريدة التايمز (لندن) ونفس الخبر من البي بي سي العربية .**الموضوع ..ان البطاطس هذه تقلى قليا اوليا فى معاملهم بالولايات المتحدة الامريكية ثم تجمد وتشحن لتقلى نهائيا بجميع فروع المطاعم بالعالم. المهم انه بعد تقطيع اصابع البطاطس ***يتم تغطيتها بطبقة رقيقة من (اللارد) وهى سمن مصنوع من الخنزير كى تقرمش بعد القلى *** ** او يستحدمون دهون بقرية مع العلم ( ان البقر مذبوح ذبحا غير حلال بالصعق الكهربى او ميت بالرصاص وطبعا تصدر هذه البطاطس الى الدول العربية والهند .** قامت الشركة بالاعتذار للهند لان الهنود لا ياكلون الحيوانات نظرا لانهم يعبدونها اما المسلمين فلا قيمة لهم وعليه فان المقصود ان البطاطس تاتى من امريكا وعليها دهن الخنزير او البقر مع ان دهن الخنزير ارخص واسم ثم تقلى بزيت نباتى عادى ولذا يعتقد الكثير انها طالما قليت بزيت نباتى فهى حلال وهنا يكون الخطافعلا ثبت ان بطاطس ماكدونالدز بها شحم الخنزير وهذا ما تاكد منه بعض الاخوة المسلمين بالخارج لذا وضحوا ذلك وعملوا موقع اسمه الاكل الحلال (eat halal) كما اكتشفت روسيا ذلك وهددتهم باغلاق فروعهم هناك وتعهدت المصانع بالقلى النباتى فقط **وختاما ارجو من كل قارئ ان ينشر هذه الرسالة ويعممها ملاحظة كونك قرأت الرسالة وعلمت فأمامك خيارين إن كانت صحيحة انت محاسب من رب العباد أنك علمت وتجاهلت وإن كانت الرسالة لم تقنعك بصحتها فانت ملزم امام الله بالبحث والاجتهاد للتاكد من صحتها والا فانت محاسب ايضا
اللهم انى قد ابلغت.......................اللهم فاشهدتاكد من الخبر على رابط موقع


BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/arabic/news/newsid_1348000/1348383.stm

A Palestinian child الطفل الفلسطيني













A Palestinian child, from Gaza, looks on while he comforts his dying mother after she was hit by the Zionist israeli bombardment, look at the sequence of the picture ...she was a live...then slowly death took her away from him

this is Zionism, this is Israel, this is how western democracy works in Palestine!!

Shame on the West the main and only backers to the Zionist atrocities in the Middleast.

Ahmad
قمة الضيم أن نرى الصهاينة يستمتعون وهم يُقتلون إخواننا المستضعفين في غزة و(عداد الشهداء والجرحى) في تزايد مخيفكل ساعة ونحن ليس لنا إلا التسمر أمام شاشات التليفزيون لمتابعتهم وهم يلفظون أنفاسهم الأخيرة أو كانوا قد لفظوها فيوقتٍ سابق !! وربما لم يكلف أحدنا نفسه حتى بالدعاء لإخوان الإسلام !**قمة القهر أن نرى السكوت المخجل والمعتاد من قادة الدول العربية الذين لاهم لهم إلا (نفسي نفسي) !!**أما (قمة الشجب والاستنكار) والتي يُفكرووون في عقدها يوم الجمعة فأتمنى ألا تعقد لأن بيانات الشجب والإدانةفقط ستضحك الصهاينة علينا أكثر وأكثر !!**أما قمة ........ (لاأدري ماذا أقول) فهي أن يرى هذا الصغير أمه وهي تلقي عليه كلماتها الأخيرة قبل أن تنتقل روحها إلى بارئها وقد لُطخ جسدُها كما جسدُ ابنها المقهور بالدماء الشريفة

نصيحة

إياك أن تتكلم في الأشياء وفي الناس .. إلا بعد أن تتأكد من صحة المصدر .. وإذا جاءك أحد بنبأ فتبين قبل أن تتهور.. وإياك والشائعة.. لا تصدق كل ما يقال ولا نصف ما تبصر .. وإذا ابتلاك الله بعدو .. قاومه بالإحسان إليه .. ادفع بالتي هي أحسن .. أقسم بالله.. أن العداوة تنقلب حباً .. تصور!!!! إذا أردت أن تكتشف صديقاً .. سافر معه .. ففي السفر .. ينكشف الإنسان .. يذوب المظهر .. وينكشف المخبر ! ولماذا سمي السفر سفراً ؟؟؟إلا لأنه عن الأخلاق والطبائع يسفر ! *----------- --------- --------- -----* وإذا هاجمك الناس وأنت على حق .. أو قذعوك بالنقد.. فافرح.. إنهم يقولون لك .. أنت ناجح ومؤثر .. فالكلب الميت.. لا يُركل! ولا يُرمى إلا الشجر المثمر ! *----------- --------- --------- -----* بني: عندما تنتقد أحداً .. فبعين النحل تعود أن تبصر .. ولا تنظر للناس بعين ذباب .. فتقع على ماهو مستقذر! *----------- --------- --------- -----* نم باكراً يابني .. فالبركة في الرزق صباحاً .. وأخاف أن يفوتك رزق الرحمن .. لأنك.. تسهر ! *----------- --------- --------- -----* وسأحكي لك قصه المعزة والذئب حتى لا تأمن من يمكر .. وحينما يثق بك أحد فإياك ثم إياك أن تغدر ! سأذهب بك لعرين الأسد .. وسأعلمك أن الأسد لم يصبح ملكاً للغابة لأنه يزأر !! ولكن لأنه .. عزيز النفس ! لا يقع على فريسة غيره ! مهما كان جائعاً .. يتضور .. لا تسرق جهد غيرك .. فتتجور! *----------- --------- --------- -----* سأذهب بك للحرباء .. حتى تشاهد بنفسك حيلتها ! فهي تلون جلدها بلون المكان .. لتعلم أن في البشر مثلها نسخ ... تتكرر ! وأن هناك منافقين .. وهناك أناس بكل لباس تتدثر ! وبدعوى الخير .. تتستر ! *----------- --------- --------- -----* تعود يا بني .. أن تشكر .. اشكر الله! يكفي أنك تمشي .. وتسمع .. وتبصر ! أشكر الله وأشكر الناس .. فالله يزيد الشاكرين ! والناس تحب الشخص الذي عندما تبذل له .. يقدر ! *----------- --------- --------- -----* اكتشفت يا بني .. أن أعظم فضيلة في الحياة.. الصدق! وأن الكذب وإن نجى .. فالصدق أخلق ! بمن كان مثلك ! *----------- --------- --------- -----* بني.. وفر لنفسك بديلاً لكل شيء .. استعد لأي أمر ! حتى لا تتوسل لنذل .. يذل ويحقر ! واستفد من كل الفرص .. لأن الفرص التي تأتي الآن .. قد لا تتكرر!! *----------- --------- --------- -----* لا تتشكى ولا تتذمر .. أريدك متفائلاً .. مقبلاً على الحياة.. اهرب من اليائسين والمتشائمين ! وإياك أن تجلس مع رجل يتطير!! *----------- --------- --------- -----* لا تتشمت ولا تفرح بمصيبة غيرك ... و إياك أن تسخر من شكل أحد.. فالمرء لم يخلق نفسه .. ففي سخريتك .. أنت في الحقيقة تسخر! من صنع الذي أبدع وخلق وصور !! *----------- --------- --------- -----* لا تفضح عيوب الناس .. فيفضحك الله في دارك .. فالله الستير .. يحب من يستر ! ولا تظلم أحداً .. وإذا دعتك قدرتك على ظلم الناس .. فتذكر أن الله هو الأقدر! *----------- --------- --------- -----* وإذا شعرت بالقسوة يوماً .. فامسح على رأس يتيم .. ولسوف تدهش .. كيف للمسح أن يمسح القسوة من القلب .. فيتفطر! *----------- --------- --------- -----* لا تجادل .. في الجدل .. كلا الطرفين يخسر ! فإذا انهزمنا فقد خسرنا كبرياءنا نحن ! وإذا فزنا فلقد خسرنا .. الشخص الآخر .. لقد انهزمنا كلنا .. الذي انتصر .. والذي ظن أنه لم يُنصر! *----------- --------- --------- -----* لا تكن أحادي الرأي .. فمن الجميل أن تؤثر وتتاثر ! لكن إياك أن تذوب في رأي الآخرين ... وإذا شعرت بأن رأيك .. مع الحق .. فاثبت عليه ولا تتأثر! *----------- --------- --------- -----* تستطيع يا بني أن تغير قناعات الناس ... وأن تستحوذ على قلوب الناس وهي لا تشعر! ليس بالسحر ولا بالشعوذة ... فبابتسامتك .. وعذوبة لفظك.. تستطيع بهما أن تسحر!! ابتسم ... فسبحان من جعل الابتسامة في ديننا.. (عبادة) وعليها نؤجر !! في الصين.. إن لم تبتسم لن يسمحوا لك أن تفتح متجر .. إن لم تجد من يبتسم لك .. ابتسم له أنت ! فإذا كان ثغرك بالبسمة يفتر .. بسرعة .. تتفتح لك القلوب لتعبر!! *----------- --------- --------- -----* وحينما يقع في قلب الناس نحوك شك .. دافع عن نفسك .. وضح .. برر! لا تكن فضولياً تدس أنفك في كل أمر ... تقف مع من وقف إذا الجمهور تجمهر !! بني.. ترفع عن هذا .. إنه يسوءني هذا المنظر !! *----------- --------- --------- -----* لا تحزن يابني على مافي الحياة ! فما خلقنا فيها إلا لنمتحن ونبتلى ... حتى يرانا الله .. هل نصبر ؟؟؟لذلك ....هون عليك ...ولا تتكدر ! وتأكد بأن الفرج قريب.. فإذا اشتد سواد السحب .. فعما قليل ستمطر !! *----------- --------- --------- -----* لا تبك على الماضي .. فيكفي أنه مضى .. فمن العبث أن نمسك نشارة الخشب .. وننشر !! أنظر للغد .. استعد .. شمّر !! كن عزيزاً .. وبنفسك افخر ! فكما ترى نفسك سيراك الآخرون .. فإياك لنفسك يوماً أن تحقر !! فأنت تكبر حينما تريد أن تكبر .. وأنت فقط من يقرر أن يصغر ! *----------- --------- --------- -----* وإذا أردت إصلاح الكون برمته .. سأقول لك ...لا... أرجوك!! لا نريد أن نفقد الشر .. تخيل أن الكون من غير غشاشين ؟ومن غير كذابين .. كيف سيعيش الشرفاء ؟؟؟ومن أين سنقتات ؟؟ وكيف سنكون نحن .. الأميز والأشهر